| Sr. No. | Name of the Appellant | States/UT | Brief of Order in Appeal (OIA) | Order No. & Date | Download | Category |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 261 | M/s. Meat Mart Unit of the New Bangalore Ham Shop | Karnataka |
"i. What percentage of GST output tax should be charged for our nature of works contract executed to Indian Railways |
KAR ADRG 07/2023 23.01.2023 |
|
97(2)(d) |
| 262 | M/s. S K Swamy and Company | Karnataka |
iii. Whether material like fertilisers, soil, sand supplied for use of bio centers are exempted as per GST?" |
KAR ADRG 05/2023 23.01.2023 |
|
97(2)(e ) |
| 263 | M/s. Prakash and Company | Karnataka |
i. Whether providing catering services to Educational Institutions from 1st standard to 2nd PUC is taxable or not according to Notification No.12/2017-Central Tax Rate-under Heading 9992. |
KAR ADRG 06/2023 23.01.2023 |
|
97(2)(b) and 97(2)(e ) |
| 264 | M/s. Sri Annapurneshwari Enterprises | Karnataka |
ii.Whether other service like data entry operator, security, provided to Horticulure Department attracts GST? |
KAR ADRG 04/2023 23.01.2023 |
|
97(2)(e ) |
| 265 | M/s Ess Kay Motors | Haryana |
Application was rejected as applicant was not responding |
HR/HAAR/29/2022-23 dated 18.01.2023 |
|
- |
| 266 | M/s Brawn Cosmetics | Haryana |
Application was rejected as applicant was not responding. |
HR/HAAR/26/2022-23 dated 18.01.2023 |
|
97 (2) |
| 267 | M/s Manvi Enterprises | Haryana |
No manual copy was submitted by applicant after given sufficient opportunities hence application was rejected . |
HR/HAAR/23/2022-23 dated 18.01.2023 |
|
- |
| 268 | M/s Microtek Greenburg | Haryana |
Application was rejected as applicant was not responding. |
R/HAAR/30/2022-23 dated 18.01.2023 |
|
- |
| 269 | M/s Wazir Home Solutions | Haryana |
Application was rejected as applicant was not responding |
HR/HAAR/28/2022-23 dated 18.01.2023 |
|
- |
| 270 | M/s Unimet Profile | Haryana |
Application was rejected as applicant was not responding. |
HR/HAAR/24/2022-23 dated 18.01.2023 |
|
- |
