Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR)

i. Whether on reimbusement of expenses at actual cost which are incurred by the employee staffs on behalf of Company is liable to tax?
ii. Whether Reverse Charge Mechanisum is applicable on reimbursement of expenses paid on behalf of the company at actuals which are incurred by the employee staff who is also a whole-time director company?
iii. Whether -
a. time limit prescribed to take input tax credit under the section 16(4) of the GST Act, 2017 applies only for the invoice or debit note for the supply of goods or services or both or it shall also applies to invoice issued in accordance with the provisions of clause (f) of sub-section (3) of section 31 i.e.., self-invoices by registered person who is liable to pay tax under sub-section (3) or sub-section (4) of section 9 (Under reverse charge mechanism).
b.Tax paid during current financial year under reverse charge mechanism as per sub-section (3) or sub-section (4) of section 9 for any of the previous financial year transaction, input tax credit on such payment of tax would be availed in the year of payment or in the year in which transaction happened.
iv. If answer to the Question 1 and Question 2 is affirmative, whether reverse charge is to be calculated on values including GST or excluding GST.

Application has been withdrawn.

i. Whether the services provided by the company to its parent company relating to the test benches which are in the name of MRO services, be classified under heading "9987 i(a): Maintenance, Repair or Overhaul services in respect of aircrafts, aircraft engines and other aircraft components or parts"?
ii. If the answer to the above is in affirmation, then whether the Place of supply is the "location of the recipient" as per the Notification No. 02/2020-Integrated Tax dated 26th March 2020 which is the location of the parent Company (Outside India) and that can be construed as exports of services?
iii. If the answer to the first question is in negation, then we would like to know the classification of the services provided to the parent company and can it be considered as exports of services?

1] To answer in affirmative or negative that the impugned product GLAZE GELS is classifiable under chapter heading as under: SCHEDULE II – SR. NO 32AA – SUGAR BOILED CONFECTIONERY. 6% MGST
2] If the answer to question 6.1] is in negative, then under which chapter heading the impugned product GLAZE GEL is to be classified.

a. Whether Tata Ace Garbage Tipper vehicle with its variants for Garbage applications as specified in Annexure `2’ (hereinafter called as Garbage Tipper vehicles), which will be manufactured exclusively keeping in view the requirements of National Green Tribunal (NGT in short), for supply to Municipal Corporations, Municipalities, Urban Development Bodies, Gram Panchayats and to contractors to whom operation & maintenance contract has been awarded by these Govt. bodies under Swachh Bharat Mission, for collection and disposal of household garbage, are classifiable under Tariff Item 8705.90.00 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) as Special Purpose Motor Vehicles or is classifiable under any other appropriate Tariff item?
b. Whether the above mentioned Garbage Tipper vehicles would attract IGST @ 18% under Sr. No. 401A under Schedule III of IGST Rates specified under Notification No. 1/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate), dated 28.06.2017, as amended?
c. If answer to question (b) above is in negative, what IGST rate would be applicable on the above mentioned Garbage Tipper vehicles?  

Whether mere transfer of monetary proceeds by the IVL India Environmental R&D PVT Ltd (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Applicant’ or “IVL India”) to IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute Limited (hereinafter referred to as “IVL Sweden”), without underlying import of service will be liable for payment of Integrated Goods and Service Tax under reverse charge mechanism under entry no. 1 of Notification 10/2017 – IGST (Rate) dated June 28, 2017

“Where inputs are consumed in the construction of an immovable property outside MAFFFL's licensed premises which are meant and intended to be for the provision of taxable output services, whether input tax credit was available to the assessee?”

1.Whether the pallets, crates and containers (hereinafter referred as “equipment”) leased by CHEP India Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as “CIPL” or “the Applicant”) located and registered in Maharashtra to its other GST registrations located across India (say CIPL Karnataka), would be considered as lease transaction and accordingly taxable as supply of services in terms of Section 7 of the CGST Act and MGST Act?

2.If the answer to Question 1 is yes, what is the value on which GST has to be charged i.e. whether it should be lease charges or the value of equipment in terms of Section 15 of the CGST Act and MGST Act read with relevant Rules?

3.What are the documents that should accompany the movement of the goods from CIPL, Maharashtra to CIPL, Karnataka?

4.Whether movement of leased equipment from CIPL, Karnataka to CIPL, Tamil Nadu on the instruction of CIPL, Maharashtra can be said to be mere movement of goods not amounting to a supply in terms of Section 7 of the CGST Act and MGST Act, and thereby not liable to GST?

5.With reference to Question 4 above, what are the documents that should accompany the movement of the goods from CIPL, Karnataka to CIPL, Tamil Nadu?

(i) Whether activity of printing and supply of question papers for Universities, Educational Boards and Educational Institutes can be classified as supply of goods or supply of services?
(ii) Whether the benefit under Sl. No.66 of the Notification No.12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) as amended from time to time, and Noti. No.12/2017-State Tax (Rate) is allowable to Applicant, if the activity is treated as supply of services?
(iii) If the activity is to be classified as supply of goods, then whether the same can be treated as exempted goods under SL. No. 119 of the exempted list at Nil rate of tax under CH 4901 i.e. Printed Books including braille books?

Whether the activity of tanning, with chemical consumption, carried out by the applicant is coming within the purview of job work chargeable to tax under the item i(e) of the Heading 9988 Manufacturing Services on Physical Inputs (Goods) owned by others and if not what would be the applicable tax rate?